Skip to main content

My Last Duchess is a poem which explores the conflict in the relationship between the powerful duke and the powerless duchess. Similarly Ozymandius also explores a power imbalance, this time between the dictator and his “lifeless things”, however it differs in that Ozymandius is not the most powerful in the poem  (as the Duke is), as Ozymandius’ power is overtaken by Nature whose “lone and level sands drift on”.
London is a poem which explores the negative effects of powerful institutions of the church and monarchy on “every infant” and “every man”. Similarly Charge of the Light Brigade also explores the power of the institution of the army – specifically the leadership, whose commands are for the soldiers “not to question why”, however it differs in that The Charge of the Light Brigade explicitly highlights the loss of life that occurs due to bad leadership from powerful institutions, whereas London merely hints at this when it talks of the “blood runs down the palace walls”.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Even with the little they, the Cratchits are appreciative. They are not greedy. Word for the Cratchits Tiny tiny little atom Tiny Tim’s “withered” hand “half of half”   There is a real sense these people are not hoarding the planet or societal resources. The Cratchits represent the poor. The Cratchits pay attention to the sounds and smells of the food also and enjoy it. Dickens uses hyperbole when talking about the pudding to highlight how importance, rare and incredible and valued it is. Pudding – ”small pudding for a large family”. Bob’s positive perception – “called a circle, meaning half a one” The Cratchits family wealth: “two tumbler and a custard cup without a handle” – this is a symbol of their wealth and how they are viewed in society as people’s status is made up of their possessions. Their possessions are pitiful. “if none of these shadows remain unaltered by the future” This is perhaps Dicken’s key mess
1 comment
Read more
Lord of the Flies Chapter 1 Lord of the Flies – the story and learning so far recap ·         “why should I be called Jack, it’s Merridew” – Jack’s initial insistence on being called by his surname firstly is militaristic as the military are referred to and know by their surnames. This furthers the references to the military and war that Golding often includes in his novel. Secondly Jack’s wish highlights his desire to be different and set apart from the others. It is also of note that the reader does not learn Jack’s first name for some time as he is referred to as the boy, and we are lots of description of his “black” clothing which creates a sinister atmosphere, then we are introduced to him by his surname before finally learning his first name, this replicates the formal, cold relationship he forms with the others boy and we too get a real sense of the distance between Jack and the others. The insistence by Jack on using his surname could also highlight his wish to comman
Post a Comment
Read more
Essay question - Do you think Piggy is an important character from Lord of the Flies?   Piggy is an important character because he is one of the few characters whose mostly fatal fates portray the disintegration of society. This is shown through the constant link between Piggy and the conch throughout the book – indeed the conch is ‘born’ with Piggy as it is he who finds it and immediately, unlike Ralph, sees it value straight away. It is poignant that not only does Piggy give birth to the conch, but that the conch dies with him also. The conch and its inextricable link to Piggy is vital in helping us to understand that what it symbolises -   order, the rule of law and mutual respect and integration of all – therefore when Piggy dies so too do all of these values and so society disintegrates. This is highlighted as the conch “exploded into a thousand white fragments”. The verb choice explode highlights the total destruction of the conch and its values and it also is associated
Post a Comment
Read more